Camelford,
England has its origins around 1259 and local folklore suggests that Camelford
was once Camelot of King Arthur legend, but that has never been actually proved,
it is conjecture. What is not conjecture is that in 1988 contamination of the
drinking water supply saw 20 tons of aluminum sulfate in the water raising the
concentration to 3,000 times the allowable limit. As the aluminum
sulphate broke down it produced tons of sulfuric acid which stripped chemicals from pipes as well as lead and copper
piping in people’s homes. People who came into contact with the contaminated
water experienced a range of short-term health effects such as joint pain, diarrhea,
blistering of the skin, and hair turning shades of green from copper residue in
the water. Many victims suffered long-term effects. The early deaths of many
Camelford residents are believed to be associated with the contaminated water,
but there has been no rigorous monitoring of the health of the victims since
the incident, considered Britain's worst mass poisoning event affecting about
20,000 people. Inquests on people who died many years later found very high
levels of aluminum in their brain.
Immediately
after the contamination authorities said the water was safe to drink, (exactly
like the Elk River contamination in West Virginia in early 2014) and it was
advised to use juice to cover any unpleasant taste – a ridiculous comment at
best. In an inquest in 2012 into the death of one of the victims, the coroner
stated that the South West Water Authority had been “gambling with as many as
20,000 lives” when they failed to inform the public about the poisoning for 16
days. There were allegations of a cover-up and West Somerset Coroner Michael Rose stated: “I found there was a deliberate
policy to not advise the public of the true nature until some 16 days after the
occurrence of the incident.” Following an investigation by the government's
Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the
Environment, the former Environment Minister claimed that “various associated
bodies tried to bury the inquiry from the start. This has become a tug of war
between the truth and an attempt to silence the truth.” In 2014 a final
government report was issued which stated there was no link between the 20 suspected
deaths and the water poisoning. The town is still divided on that since the
coroner’s report reached vastly different conclusions than the official government
report.
In
the U.S, as well as the UK, the name of the game is sadly and dubiously called “Risk
Assessment,” a process of estimating the threat that environmental contaminants
pose to humans. Scientists generally base risk assessments on toxicity studies performed
on laboratory animals and on data from human exposure in the workplace where a
chemical is made or used. These studies estimate potential health threats to
people exposed over many years to low levels of chemicals in drinking water,
but these types of studies also produce ambiguous results. Uncertainties stem
from incomplete data and the difficulty of comparing health effects on
laboratory animals to real humans living in a real environment. The risk
assessment for a chemical usually does not take into account all chemicals
people are exposed to in water, food and air. For example, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) has assessed the risk of a number of pesticides and
volatile organic chemicals (VOC) sometimes found in drinking water. Tetrachloroethylene,
a common VOC is used in dry cleaning solvents, metal degreasers, textile dyes,
aerosols, and household pesticides. Experts suspect it can cause cancer and
liver and kidney damage in humans. The EPA estimates that one part per billion
tetrachloroethylene in drinking water could lead to one or two additional cases
of cancer in a population of one million people who drink such water over a
70-year time frame. In other words, certain death, but at such low levels, it
not considered harmful to the greater population. But knowing that toxic water
will eventually cause certain death is clearly not enough of a motivator. But
in Italy, it was worse.
In
the shadow of Mt. Vesuvius just outside of Naples is the village of Acerra. The
national average for juvenile brain tumors in Italy is just 0.5 for every
100,000 children. But for Acerra’s 55,000 residents, the average number is
three children with brain cancer at any given time, which has been attributed
to the willful dumping of toxic chemicals into the ground and water by the
Camorra crime syndicate. Over the last 20 years thousands of tons of toxic
waste have been dumped, burned and buried in an area known as the ‘triangle of
death’ that runs from Naples to Caserta to Mt. Vesuvius. The toxins have so polluted
the groundwater and poisoned the soil the Italian government refers to the area
as the “terra di tumori” - land of tumors. But in another tale of government
irresponsibility, have they done anything?
According
to a study by the Pascale Institute in Naples, the mortality rate from cancer
in this triangle of death has risen between 15 and 20% over the last decade.
But in some towns, like Acerra, the increase is more than 30%. If nothing is
done to clean the soil and decontaminate the water supply the rate is expected
to grow to 47% for men and 40% for women by this year, 2016. The Pascale study
found that 9,969 people have died from cancer and pulmonary diseases, allegedly
related to the toxic waste and water, since 2005. The British journal The
Lancet, first analyzed the rising levels of toxins after the U.S. military base
in Naples started warning troops and their families stationed in the area not
to drink the water or eat dairy products because of suspected high levels of
toxins. Then the U.S. Navy did its own study in 2011 and found that high levels
of arsenic, fecal coliform, banned insecticides, and dioxins were found in
random tests of water samples in the area. The report warned U.S. military
personnel based in Naples to stay clear of the local water supplies, suggesting
the “use of bottled water for off-base personnel, for drinking, food
preparation, cooking, brushing teeth, making ice, and for pets, due to the
widespread presence of contaminants as measured in the tap water, as well as
the other drinking water system infrastructure deficiencies.”
The
Italian government has been reluctant to admit they have known about the
problem for years in spite of court transcripts in 1997 by a former Camorra
underling named Carmine Schiavone, who detailed first-hand the Camorra’s
actions. “It became a real business, which brought money in, but the residents
risked dying of cancer within 20 years. I don’t think they can be saved,” he
told the court. “We have killed your children.” Schiavone says he went to the
police because he could no longer stand by and watch the illegal activity. “I
warned them that this toxic waste would kill entire generations. They told me
not to worry, and just drink bottled water.” It is estimated that more than
100,000 tons of toxic waste have been dumped in the area between 1991 and 2013,
even implying the use of 400,000 semi trucks that ferried the waste from more
443 Italian companies who reportedly commissioned the Camorra to do their dirty
work (literally) rather than disposing of the waste properly. If there is indeed
government collusion on this, it unmasks the vulnerability of the municipal water
supply.
Can
your tap water kill you? The unfortunate answer is yes – though to be clear
these are uncommon occurrences and my objective is never to produce fear, but
to produce change. The above examples show that contaminated tap water can kill
sometimes quickly, and sometimes over a period of decades and this is the exact
reason we need to be vigilant about our water supplies and uncover governmental
mismanagement, like what is happening in Flint right now, fix the problem and
prosecute those who clearly do wrong to our water.
I am sure this paragraph has touched all the internet people, its really really nice paragraph on building up new blog.
ReplyDeleteHot Water System
Thanks for informing us in which there authentic description for users. I hope you will share some more info which will deffinetly helpful as user point of view.
ReplyDeleteReverse Osmosis | Ultra filtration
Hello admin,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your great information.I read your blog. Fantstic article and design.Thanks for sharing this awesome blog. The art of glass pipes dates as early as 3000 B.C. The first glass pipes originated in Egypt and Mesopotamia through a process that used molten sand to mold glass. These early glass pieces took such unprecedented skill to make that they were considered as valuable as jewels.I am drawing attention to read more about-high quality glass water pipes
Thanks a lot
Marry Green
Thanks for making the effort to describe the terminlogy to the beginners!
ReplyDeletewater bath manufacturers